Compare 23 min read

The 6 best AI skills assessment tools for non-technical roles in 2026

Scored on published criteria: what the candidate does with AI, how the score is produced, integrity, coverage and price.

CG
Christopher Greco Head of Product Marketing, Codility · Last updated October 20, 2026

Codility scored highest on our published criteria for hiring into business roles and measuring current teams, where the decision has to hold up to a candidate, a regulator or a client. CodeSignal ranks second, and the difference between the two is how the score is produced and how much of the AI activity the reviewer can see. Workera, Canditech, iMocha and TestGorilla complete the list, in that order.

AI tools are now part of the job in business roles, including sales, marketing, finance and operations. When leadership asks for every hire to work well with AI, talent, HR and learning teams have to measure it, for new hires and for current employees. A résumé line or a self-rating does not show whether a person can produce good work with an AI tool, so you need a way to test it directly. The tools built to test AI skills work in different ways, and the differences decide whether the result can support a hiring decision.

Between September 9 and October 9, 2026, we read product, pricing, help-center and trust pages for the 12 vendors named in this article. We rechecked every competitor claim on October 19, 2026, and read review ratings on Capterra and G2.

The article covers:

  • A ranked shortlist of 6 AI skills assessment tools, with the full scoring sheet behind it
  • A side-by-side view of how the candidate uses AI in each tool, and how the score is produced
  • Pricing models, five questions to ask each vendor and a decision table you can fill in

Key takeaways

  • The test format decides whether you see real AI work. The six tools use three formats: scenario questions, an AI-led interview or conversation, and a task done with an embedded AI tool. Only a task done with an AI tool shows whether someone can produce work with it.
  • Ask whether AI produces the score, and where a person reviews it before a decision. Legal teams ask both questions before a score informs a hiring decision. TestGorilla documents AI-scored interviews that recruiters can override. Canditech scores open answers with AI scoring agents. CodeSignal uses AI to grade responses against rubrics. Codility scores the deliverable deterministically against an expert-defined answer space, so the same deliverable gets the same score every time, and no generative AI grades the work.
  • When AI is allowed, integrity comes from a reviewable record of how the candidate used it. Codility saves the full AI Assistant conversation to the candidate record on every result, next to identity verification and proctoring. Canditech shows recruiters how candidates used ChatGPT and search. CodeSignal logs prompts and responses and makes the logs available to customers on request.
  • Check which plan includes the business-role AI assessments. CodeSignal puts its finance and operations assessments on the quote-only Pro plan, and Canditech puts its AI skills evaluation on its Enterprise plan. Codility lists its Business task library on its Custom plan. TestGorilla puts job simulations and its full AI interview library on its Plus plan.
  • Match the tool to the decision the score has to support. For hiring into business roles and measuring current teams, where the decision has to hold up to a candidate, a regulator or a client, Codility scored highest on our published criteria. CodeSignal fits one vendor across business and technical roles, Workera fits workforce programs tied to learning paths, and TestGorilla fits teams that need a free plan.

Which are the best AI skills assessment tools for non-technical roles in 2026?

  1. 01 Codility: Best for hiring into business roles and measuring current teams, where the decision has to hold up to a candidate, a regulator or a client 290/315
  2. 02 CodeSignal: Best for one vendor for AI skills across business and technical roles, with a broad business assessment catalog 270/315
  3. 03 Workera: Best for workforce AI-skills programs where the assessment feeds learning paths 230/315
  4. 04 Canditech: Best for hiring into customer-facing and operations roles with ChatGPT embedded in the test 215/315
  5. 05 iMocha: Best for enterprises building a skills architecture on Workday or SAP SuccessFactors 205/315
  6. 06 TestGorilla: Best for small teams screening many roles on a free or self-serve plan 200/315

What does the candidate do with AI during the test?

An AI skills assessment observes a person using AI to do work, or asks the person about using it. The six tools on this list use three formats. A fourth format, the self-report questionnaire, asks people to rate their own AI skills. SHL’s approach to AI skills is one example.

Tool
Scenario questions
AI-led interview or conversation
Task done with an embedded AI tool
How the score is produced
Codility
No
No
Yes, the AI Assistant on the same screen as the task brief
Deterministic, against an expert-defined answer space, with no generative AI
CodeSignal
Yes
Yes, conversation question types
Yes, embedded AI tools in timed scenario tasks
AI grades responses against rubrics
Workera
Yes
Yes, role-play with a simulated manager
No AI tool documented
Evidence-centered design rubrics
Canditech
No
No
Yes, a monitored ChatGPT integration
AI scoring agents for open text and video
iMocha
Yes, with prompt exercises
No
Not stated
Not published
TestGorilla
Yes
Yes, AI interviews run by an AI avatar
Stated on its AI page, tool not named
AI scores interviews 0 to 5, recruiters can override

A scenario question shows how a person reasons about AI. A task done with an AI tool shows whether the person can direct the tool, check its output and deliver a finished piece of work. The task format is closer to the job.

How did we choose and score these tools?

We scored each tool on eight weighted criteria, using only each vendor’s public documentation.

Inclusion and exclusion rules

We included a tool when the vendor’s own public pages show three things: the vendor sells a ready-made assessment of AI skills for non-technical roles, the format of the assessment is documented, and the assessment can be used for hiring or for current employees.

We excluded AI assessments built only for technical AI roles, learning platforms whose tests place people into courses or certify course completion, and tools with no public documentation of the test format.

Other tools we evaluated include:

  • SHL: its approach to AI skills is measured through SHL’s Global Skills Assessment, a questionnaire of about 15 minutes in which people compare short behavioral statements, so the person does not use an AI tool during the assessment.
  • HackerRank: its AI evaluation grades how engineering candidates work with AI in coding tasks. We found no AI skills assessment for non-technical roles.
  • HackerEarth: its AI assessment page names AI engineers, ML engineers and data scientists only.
  • Spotted Zebra: an AI interview agent for non-technical roles that assesses behavioral and cognitive fit. We found no AI skills assessment.
  • Vervoe: work-sample testing across roles, with published help-center rules for candidate AI use. We found no dedicated AI skills assessment.
  • DataCamp: a learning platform with AI certifications, excluded as a learning platform. DataCamp retired its Jobs product on June 23, 2025.

Scoring criteria

Each criterion is rated Strong, Partial, Limited or Not documented. Strong scores 3 points, Partial 2, Limited 1 and Not documented 0, so the weighted score is out of 315.

#
Criterion
Weight
Strong requires
1
Evidence of applied AI work
25%
The person uses an AI tool inside the task to produce a deliverable, and the deliverable is scored
2
Scoring defensibility and validation
20%
The vendor documents how the score is produced and publishes validation or bias-audit evidence for these assessments
3
Role coverage for non-technical functions
15%
Ready-made AI skills assessments across sales, marketing, finance, operations, HR and service roles
4
Integrity signals with AI permitted
15%
Identity verification, proctoring and a reviewable record of the AI activity, all documented
5
Hiring and workforce baselining
10%
Documented use for pre-hire decisions and for baselines of current employees, with reporting
6
Integrations
10%
Named applicant tracking system (ATS) and HR information system (HRIS) or learning management system (LMS) integrations
7
Pricing transparency
5%
Published prices for a plan that includes the non-technical AI skills assessments
8
Compliance posture
5%
SOC 2, ISO 27001, EU data hosting and a published EU AI Act position, all documented on the vendor's own pages

Integrity signals are the evidence a reviewer uses to confirm that the person who took the test did the work: identity checks, proctoring and the record of the AI activity.

Tool
1 Applied AI work
2 Defensibility
3 Role coverage
4 Integrity
5 Hiring + workforce
6 Integrations
7 Pricing
8 Compliance
Score out of 315
1Codility
S
S
P
S
S
S
L
S
290
2CodeSignal
S
P
S
P
S
S
P
P
270
3Workera
P
P
S
L
S
S
P
P
230
4Canditech
S
L
S
P
L
P
L
P
215
5iMocha
P
L
P
P
S
S
L
P
205
6TestGorilla
P
L
S
P
L
P
S
P
200
SStrong (3 points) PPartial (2 points) LLimited (1 point) NNot documented (0 points)

We set the weights before rating any tool, based on the points a talent or assessment leader has to defend when an AI skills result drives a hiring decision. We added the compliance criterion on review at 5%, the weight our coding interview platform comparison gives its enterprise criterion. No other weight changed, so the weights add up to 105%. When two tools tie, integrity signals decide the order. Codility ranks first on the weights above and under three other weightings: equal weights, compliance at 10% and a weighting built for hiring. Under a weighting built for workforce programs, Codility and CodeSignal tie at 285, and integrity signals put Codility first.

Three ratings separate Codility and CodeSignal:

  • Integrity, Codility Strong, CodeSignal Partial. Codility documents identity verification, proctoring, behavioral monitoring and the full AI Assistant conversation on every result. CodeSignal documents AI proctoring and ID verification on every Hire plan, and its trust center says AI prompts and responses are logged and that customers can request the logs. CodeSignal does not document a reviewer view of that record on each result.
  • Defensibility, Codility Strong, CodeSignal Partial. Codility documents deterministic scoring with no generative AI in the grading. CodeSignal documents AI grading against rubrics and states validation by industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists and annual independent bias audits. We found no published audit report or validation study.
  • Compliance, Codility Strong, CodeSignal Partial. Codility documents all four facts. CodeSignal documents SOC 2 Type II and an EU AI Act alignment statement, hosts data in US AWS regions only and lists no ISO 27001 certification.

Transparency and limitations

Data cutoff
October 9, 2026, with every competitor claim rechecked on October 19, 2026. Canditech’s and TestGorilla’s pricing pages were read again on October 20, 2026.
Affiliation
Codility publishes this article and is one of the tools scored. The scoring sheet above shows how every rating was reached.
Evidence base
The ratings are our judgment of public documentation. We did not run hands-on trials of competitor products.
Compliance
Criterion 8 checks the facts each vendor documents on its own pages. The legal reading of the EU AI Act stays with legal review.
Sources
Every competitor rating and con cites its source page and the date it was checked.

Comparison snapshot

Use this table for a two-minute comparison. Each entry below restates the price and the fit in full.

Tool
Best for
How the candidate uses AI
How the score is produced
Entry pricing
Rating
Who should not use it
Codility
Hiring into business roles and measuring current teams
Produces a deliverable with the AI Assistant
Deterministic, no generative AI
$1,200 a year; Business task library on Custom, by quote
4.6/5 Capterra, 43 reviews
Teams that need a self-serve plan for business roles today, or a self-report or personality read
CodeSignal
One vendor across business and technical roles
Timed scenario tasks with embedded AI tools
AI grades against rubrics
$79 a month on Build, billed annually
4.6/5 Capterra, 49 reviews
Teams that need the reviewer to see the AI record on every result
Workera
Workforce programs tied to learning paths
Scenario questions and role-play
Evidence-centered design rubrics
From less than $5 per participant
4.6/5 G2, 26 reviews
Teams hiring at volume that need documented proctoring
Canditech
Customer-facing and operations hiring
Monitored ChatGPT inside the test
AI scoring agents
$150 a month, billed yearly; AI skills evaluation on Enterprise
5.0/5 Capterra, 53 reviews
Teams that need published validation of AI-scored answers
iMocha
A skills architecture on Workday or SAP SuccessFactors
Scenario questions and prompt exercises
Not published
Quote only
4.5/5 Capterra, 30 reviews
Teams that need to see how scores are produced
TestGorilla
Small teams screening many roles
AI interviews and scenario tasks
AI scores interviews, recruiter override
Free plan; Plus from $520 a month, billed annually
4.1/5 Capterra, 268 reviews
Teams that need a score produced with no AI in it

The 6 best AI skills assessment tools for non-technical roles

Every entry uses the same fields: overview, best for, key features, how the candidate uses AI, pros, cons, pricing and user reviews.

1.Codility

An AI for Business task: the brief, the solution editor and the AI Assistant on one screen. AI for Business Customer success assessment
Task 2 of 3
34 min left Submit task
Task brief
Draft a renewal-risk summary
Customer success40 min

Northwind Logistics renews in 45 days. Your account lead needs a one-page summary of renewal risk before the QBR.

Your deliverable
  • Usage trend for the last two quarters
  • The three biggest risks, with evidence
  • A recommended next step for the account lead
Files
account_notes.txt q3_usage_export.csv
Solution
Renewal risk: Northwind Logistics
Usage trend

Active seats fell from 142 to 97 between Q2 and Q3. After removing the 28 seats moved to the parent account on August 14, the real decline is 17 seats, or 12%.

Top risks
  1. The executive sponsor left in July and has no named replacement.
  2. Two open escalations on reporting exports are older than 30 days.
  3. The warehouse team stopped logging in after the August release.
214 wordsSaved
AI Assistant
Summarise seat usage in q3_usage_export.csv for Q2 and Q3.
Active seats fell from 142 in Q2 to 97 in Q3, a 32% decline. Most of the drop happened in August.
The account notes say seats were reassigned in August. Check that before you give me a number.
You’re right. 28 seats moved to the parent account on August 14. Excluding them, the decline is 17 seats, or 12%.
Ask the AI Assistant
This conversation is saved to your result.
290 / 315 Rank 1 of 6
1 S
2 S
3 P
4 S
5 S
6 S
7 L
8 S
How the candidate uses AI Produces a deliverable with the AI Assistant
How the score is produced Deterministic, no generative AI
Entry pricing $1,200 a year; Business task library on Custom, by quote
User rating 4.6/5 Capterra, 43 reviews

AI for Business is Codility’s assessment of AI skills in business roles. AI for Business runs on the same platform as Screen and Skills Intelligence, so it draws on almost two decades of assessment science and the same compliance posture: SOC 2 Type II audited, ISO 27001 and data hosting in the US or the EU. Teams that already use Codility for engineering hiring add AI for Business on the same platform.

In an AI for Business task, the candidate produces a deliverable with the AI Assistant. Codility scores that deliverable deterministically against an expert-defined answer space, with no generative AI in the grading. The reviewer gets the full AI Assistant conversation, saved to the candidate record as reviewable AI activity, next to identity verification and proctoring.

ScreenCustomer success managerJordan Ellis
78%
Jordan EllisCompleted
AI for Business · Customer success · 3 tasks · Submitted October 14, 2026
Export report
Summary Deliverables AI Assistant Integrity
Task scores
Prioritise a support queue85%
Draft a renewal-risk summary74%
Write a QBR agenda76%
Assessment integrity
Identity verification
ID matched to the candidate before the first task
Verified
Proctoring
Webcam and screen recorded for the session
No risk
Behavioral monitoring
One tab switch, during the file download
Low
AI Assistant conversation Task 2 · 14 messages
Candidate · 12:04Summarise seat usage in q3_usage_export.csv for Q2 and Q3.
AI Assistant · 12:04Active seats fell from 142 in Q2 to 97 in Q3, a 32% decline.
Candidate · 12:06The account notes say seats were reassigned in August. Check that before you give me a number.
AI Assistant · 12:0628 seats moved to the parent account on August 14. Excluding them, the decline is 12%.
View full conversation

Best for

Hiring into business roles and measuring current teams, where the decision has to hold up to a candidate, a regulator or a client.

Key features

  • Tasks for business functions including customer support, customer success, sales, product management, product marketing, marketing, data analysis and finance, plus general workforce tasks that apply across job families
  • Screen for hiring and Skills Intelligence for measuring current teams, with the same tasks in both
  • Identity verification, proctoring and behavioral monitoring on every result
  • No AI or machine learning makes automated hiring decisions, and the hiring decision stays with a person on your team
  • ATS and HRIS integrations including Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workday and SAP on the Custom plan
  • A published EU AI Act hiring checklist
AI skills baseline: commercial teams
Skills Intelligence · Round 1 · September 2026
Compare rounds Start round 2
Participants
186
Completion rate
91%
Median score
64%
Checked AI output before use
58%
TeamParticipantsMedian scoreBelow 50%Status
Sales 48 61% 23% Retest after training
Marketing 32 70% 9% On target
Customer success 41 66% 15% On target
Finance 27 58% 30% Retest after training
Operations 38 63% 18% In progress

How the candidate uses AI

The candidate works with the AI Assistant on one screen, next to the task brief and a solution editor, and submits a finished deliverable. Tasks run about 20 to 60 minutes, and an assessment can combine several tasks.

Pros

  • The reviewer can explain how a score was reached, because the score is produced deterministically from the deliverable
  • One candidate record holds the deliverable, the AI activity and the integrity signals, for candidates and current employees alike
  • An interviewer can read the AI Assistant conversation before the next round and ask the candidate why they used or changed the AI’s output

Cons

  • The Business task library is listed on the quote-only Custom plan, and free trials run through Codility’s team instead of a self-serve sign-up.
  • The named task library covers eight business functions plus general workforce tasks. CodeSignal, TestGorilla and Canditech publish wider ready-made catalogs.
  • Codility offers no self-report or personality instruments.

Pricing

  • Starter: $1,200 a year for 120 invites and 1 user.
  • Scale: $6,000 a year for 300 invites and 3 users.
  • Custom: priced by quote. The Custom plan lists the Engineering and Business task libraries and the enterprise integrations.

User reviews

Codility is rated 4.6 out of 5 on Capterra from 43 reviews, checked October 9, 2026, and 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from 906 reviews, checked October 15, 2026. Both ratings cover Codility as a whole, and we found no reviews that name AI for Business.

Sources: AI for Business, pricing, compliance, checked October 9 and 19, 2026.

2.CodeSignal

270 / 315 Rank 2 of 6
1 S
2 P
3 S
4 P
5 S
6 S
7 P
8 P
How the candidate uses AI Timed scenario tasks with embedded AI tools
How the score is produced AI grades against rubrics
Entry pricing $79 a month on Build, billed annually
User rating 4.6/5 Capterra, 49 reviews

CodeSignal sells technical and business assessments. Its AI Literacy Assessment launched in April 2025, and CodeSignal added assessments for more business and technical roles on July 14, 2026. CodeSignal leads with a broad business assessment catalog. Codility takes a different approach to the same need: Codility scores the deliverable deterministically, and the reviewer gets the AI Assistant conversation with identity and proctoring signals on every result.

Best for

One vendor for AI skills across business and technical roles, with a broad business assessment catalog.

Key features

  • AI skills assessments for sales, marketing, finance and operations roles, for hiring and for current employees
  • Written, conversation and prompting question types, with 20 to 30 minutes for the AI literacy assessments
  • A choice of the large language models (LLMs) that power the assessment
  • AI proctoring and ID verification on every Hire plan, and ATS integrations including Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, iCIMS and SmartRecruiters

How the candidate uses AI

The candidate completes timed, scenario-based tasks with embedded AI tools.

Pros

  • A wide ready-made catalog, so one vendor covers many business and technical roles
  • Published self-serve plans for teams that want to start without a sales call

Cons

  • AI grades responses against rubrics. CodeSignal states I-O psychologist validation and annual independent bias audits, and no audit report is published.
  • AI prompts and responses are logged and available to customers on request, with no reviewer view on each result documented.
  • Data is hosted in US AWS regions only, according to CodeSignal’s trust center FAQ.
  • Finance and operations assessments sit on the quote-only Pro plan, and the pricing page does not name the AI skills assessments.

Pricing

  • Build: $79 a month, billed annually.
  • Grow: $479 a month, billed annually.
  • Pro: custom pricing. Extra credits cost $20 each.

User reviews

CodeSignal is rated 4.6 out of 5 on Capterra from 49 reviews, checked October 9, 2026, and 4.5 out of 5 on G2 from 1,408 reviews, checked October 20, 2026.

Sources: AI skills assessments, pricing, trust center, July 14 release, checked October 9 and 19, 2026.

3.Workera

230 / 315 Rank 3 of 6
1 P
2 P
3 S
4 L
5 S
6 S
7 P
8 P
How the candidate uses AI Scenario questions and role-play
How the score is produced Evidence-centered design rubrics
Entry pricing From less than $5 per participant
User rating 4.6/5 G2, 26 reviews

Workera sells AI skills verification for workforce programs, and its AI Readiness Assessments launched on May 27, 2026. Workera leads on tying the assessment to learning paths. AI for Business measures current teams through Skills Intelligence, so Codility serves workforce programs too.

Best for

Workforce AI-skills programs where the assessment feeds learning paths.

Key features

  • Scenario-based assessments built with evidence-centered design rubrics, 20 to 30 minutes long
  • Job-based tests that include role-play with a simulated manager
  • A spoken “Talk” option that lets people explain their reasoning for partial credit
  • More than 250 HRIS, ATS and LMS integrations, according to Workera’s May 27 release

How the candidate uses AI

The person answers scenario questions and role-plays with a simulated manager. We found no statement that the person uses an AI tool to produce work during the assessment.

Pros

  • Results connect to learning paths, so a skills gap leads to training
  • A low published entry price per participant

Cons

  • Hiring is secondary to workforce use in Workera’s documentation.
  • The only documented integrity control is a choice of proctoring depth when a hiring program is set up.
  • Ownership changes when Pearson’s acquisition closes, expected by the end of 2026.

Pricing

  • Per-participant bundle: starts at less than $5 per participant, according to the May 27, 2026 release.
  • Enterprise: custom pricing.

User reviews

Workera is rated 4.6 out of 5 on G2 from 26 reviews, checked October 9, 2026.

Sources: AI skills page, May 27 release, Pearson acquisition report, checked October 9 and 20, 2026.

4.Canditech

215 / 315 Rank 4 of 6
1 S
2 L
3 S
4 P
5 L
6 P
7 L
8 P
How the candidate uses AI Monitored ChatGPT inside the test
How the score is produced AI scoring agents
Entry pricing $150 a month, billed yearly; AI skills evaluation on Enterprise
User rating 5.0/5 Capterra, 53 reviews

Canditech sells job-simulation assessments for hiring, for roles that include marketing, sales, HR, finance, operations and call center work. Canditech leads with a ChatGPT integration embedded in the test. Both tools let the candidate work with AI inside the task, so Codility matches Canditech on format. Codility differs on scoring, because no generative AI produces Codility’s score.

Best for

Hiring into customer-facing and operations roles with ChatGPT embedded in the test.

Key features

  • A monitored ChatGPT integration inside the assessment
  • Job simulations with open-text and video answers
  • Copy-paste and tab tracking, webcam snapshots and ChatGPT detection
  • Integrations with more than 40 ATS tools

How the candidate uses AI

The candidate uses ChatGPT inside the assessment, and the recruiter sees how the candidate used ChatGPT and search tools.

Pros

  • AI use is visible to the recruiter inside a realistic job simulation
  • Published monthly prices for the Team and Pro plans

Cons

  • AI scoring agents score open-text and video answers, and we found no published validation.
  • The AI skills evaluation with monitored ChatGPT and the AI scoring agents sit on the Enterprise plan, which is priced by quote.
  • Use for current employees is not documented.

Pricing

  • Individual: one assessment and three users, with no published price.
  • Team: $150 a month, billed yearly, for 100 candidates a year.
  • Pro: $200 a month, billed yearly, for 100 candidates a year, with ATS integration.
  • Enterprise: contact sales. Enterprise adds the AI skills evaluation and the AI scoring agents.

User reviews

Canditech is rated 5.0 out of 5 on Capterra from 53 reviews, checked October 9, 2026. Isaac A., an HR recruiting specialist, wrote on Capterra on January 14, 2026: “It shows how candidates use ChatGPT and search tools.” We could not read Canditech’s G2 page.

Sources: AI assessment page, pricing, embedded ChatGPT and search help article, checked October 9 and 20, 2026.

5.iMocha

205 / 315 Rank 5 of 6
1 P
2 L
3 P
4 P
5 S
6 S
7 L
8 P
How the candidate uses AI Scenario questions and prompt exercises
How the score is produced Not published
Entry pricing Quote only
User rating 4.5/5 Capterra, 30 reviews

iMocha sells skills assessments and a skills intelligence platform for large enterprises. iMocha leads with a skills architecture integrated with Workday and SAP SuccessFactors.

Best for

Enterprises building a skills architecture on Workday or SAP SuccessFactors.

Key features

  • A Gen AI Readiness Assessment for Non-Tech: 25 scenario-based questions and practical exercises in 30 minutes
  • Prompt exercises inside the test
  • Use for hiring and for current employees, with AI skills reporting across the workforce
  • Workday and SAP SuccessFactors integrations

How the candidate uses AI

The person answers scenario-based questions and completes prompt exercises. iMocha does not state whether a live AI tool is provided during the test.

Pros

  • Results feed a skills architecture inside Workday or SAP SuccessFactors
  • Proctoring is available on the AI test

Cons

  • The scoring method is not published.
  • The AI test names five generic roles.
  • Secure browser and ID verification are switched on through iMocha’s support team.

Pricing

  • Quote only.

User reviews

iMocha is rated 4.5 out of 5 on Capterra from 30 reviews, checked October 9, 2026, and 4.4 out of 5 on G2 from 276 reviews, checked October 20, 2026.

Sources: AI test page, workforce AI skills blog, updated July 6, 2026, checked October 9, 2026.

6.TestGorilla

200 / 315 Rank 6 of 6
1 P
2 L
3 S
4 P
5 L
6 P
7 S
8 P
How the candidate uses AI AI interviews and scenario tasks
How the score is produced AI scores interviews, recruiter override
Entry pricing Free plan; Plus from $520 a month, billed annually
User rating 4.1/5 Capterra, 268 reviews

TestGorilla sells pre-employment tests for many roles. TestGorilla leads with a free plan and with AI interviews.

Best for

Small teams screening many roles on a free or self-serve plan.

Key features

  • AI interviews run by an AI avatar and scored from the transcript
  • Scenario-based tasks and a five-pillar framework for AI skills
  • Job simulations, ATS and API integrations, and ID verification on the Plus plan

How the candidate uses AI

The candidate answers an AI interviewer and completes scenario-based tasks. TestGorilla’s AI page says candidates do realistic work using AI, and it does not name the tool.

Pros

  • A free plan to start with
  • Published prices for the plan that includes AI interviews and job simulations

Cons

  • AI scores each interview from 0 to 5 based on the transcript, and recruiters can override the score.
  • Job simulations, ATS integrations and ID verification sit on the Plus plan only.
  • The AI page is written for hiring only, and use for current employees is not documented.

Pricing

  • Free: $0 a month.
  • Core: from $215 a month per account, billed annually.
  • Plus: from $520 a month per account, billed annually. Job simulations cost 2 credits per candidate and ID verification 1 credit.

User reviews

TestGorilla is rated 4.1 out of 5 on Capterra from 268 reviews, checked October 9, 2026, and 4.5 out of 5 on G2 from 1,448 reviews, checked October 20, 2026. Billing terms come up in critical reviews: Ngan D., an HR manager, wrote on Capterra on October 2, 2025 that the team “emailed support almost 20 times begging for cancellation”.

Sources: AI page, pricing, AI interview scoring, checked September 30, October 9 and October 20, 2026.

How much do AI skills assessment tools cost?

AI skills assessment tools are sold four ways: a free plan, a published self-serve price, a per-participant price or a quote. The plan that includes the business-role AI assessments is often a higher tier than the entry plan, so check that plan’s price when you compare vendors.

Tool
Free plan
Published entry price
Plan with the business-role AI assessments
Unit
Codility
No
$1,200 a year
Custom, by quote
Invites
CodeSignal
No
$79 a month, billed annually
Finance and operations on Pro, by quote
Credits
Workera
No
Less than $5 per participant
Per-participant bundle
Participants
Canditech
No
$150 a month, billed yearly
Enterprise, by quote
Candidates a year
iMocha
No
Not published
Quote
Not published
TestGorilla
Yes
Core from $215 a month, billed annually
Plus, from $520 a month
Accounts and credits

The units differ between vendors, so a price per candidate is not comparable across the table.

How do you choose an AI skills assessment tool?

1

Decide which decision the score supports

A hiring decision needs a score you can explain to a candidate and keep on record. Decide where the AI skills result sits next to any cognitive or situational judgment test you already run, and whether it counts as a weighted factor or a pass mark. A workforce baseline needs results you can repeat after training, so you can show whether the training changed the work people produce. If your main goal is to route people into learning paths, Workera is built for that.

2

Ask how the candidate uses AI

Ask each vendor to show you the test from the candidate’s side. A scenario question tests judgment about AI, and a task with an embedded AI tool tests whether the person can produce work with it. Ask to see a task at the level of the people you will test, from graduates to experienced staff, because a task that is too hard or too easy for the group tells you little. If you only need a quick read of how people across the workforce rate their own AI skills, a self-report questionnaire such as SHL’s is faster.

3

Ask how the score is produced and where a person reviews it

Ask whether AI grades the answers, where a person reviews the result before a hiring decision, and where the validation evidence is published. Ask for criterion-related validity, reliability and adverse-impact results for the assessment you will use. Hand the answers to your assessment science or industrial-organizational psychology team if you have one, and to legal.

4

Ask how much the reviewer sees when AI is allowed

Ask whether the reviewer sees the full AI conversation on each result, or only on request, and whether the record shows when the candidate checked the AI’s output before using it. Ask which identity and proctoring signals sit next to it in the candidate record.

5

Check the plan that includes business roles

Ask which plan includes the business-role AI assessments, the integrations and ID verification. Ask whether you can pilot with one group, such as interns or one team, before an annual contract. If you already use the vendor for engineering assessments, ask whether that contract can cover business roles. If you need a free plan to start with today, TestGorilla offers one.

The scoring sheet, criterion by criterion

Every criterion, its weight, the question to put to each vendor, and how the top three scored. Use the questions as your own shortlist checklist.

Criterion and the question to ask
Our weight
Codility
CodeSignal
Workera
Evidence of applied AI workDoes the candidate use an AI tool to produce a scored deliverable?
25%
Strong
Strong
Partial
Scoring defensibility and validationHow is the score produced, and where is the validation evidence published?
20%
Strong
Partial
Partial
Role coverage for non-technical functionsWhich business functions have ready-made AI tasks today?
15%
Partial
Strong
Strong
Integrity signals with AI permittedDoes the reviewer see the AI record, identity checks and proctoring on every result?
15%
Strong
Partial
Limited
Hiring and workforce baseliningCan the same assessment be used for candidates and current employees?
10%
Strong
Strong
Strong
IntegrationsWhich ATS and HRIS receive the results?
10%
Strong
Strong
Strong
Pricing transparencyWhich published plan includes the business-role assessments?
5%
Limited
Partial
Partial
Compliance postureWhere are SOC 2, ISO 27001, EU hosting and your EU AI Act position documented?
5%
Strong
Partial
Partial
Weighted total
105%
290/ 315Highest score
270/ 315
230/ 315

Strong scores 3 points, Partial 2, Limited 1 and Not documented 0. Each weight is multiplied by its rating, so the maximum is three times the sum of the weights.

See a scored AI for Business result before you shortlist

We will walk you through a sample report, including the AI Assistant conversation the reviewer sees and how the score was produced.

Book a walkthrough

FAQ

An AI skills assessment is a test that shows how well a person uses AI tools to do the work of their role. The strongest format observes the person producing a deliverable with an AI tool and scores the deliverable. That format shows how the person directs the tool, checks its output and turns it into finished work. Weaker formats ask questions about AI or ask people to rate their own skills. Those formats show knowledge or confidence, and they do not show the quality of the work.

CG
About the author

Christopher Greco is Head of Product Marketing at Codility, where he owns the positioning of Codility’s assessment products, including AI for Business.

Measure AI skills in business roles

Hire and baseline current teams with one scored deliverable and one reviewable AI record.

Talk to us About AI for Business